Journal Contents

all articles of volume 4 issue 3 | return to Journal Contents

Article of Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2009

Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses

Author: Jan van Aalst

Abstract: The study reported here sought to obtain the clear articulation of asynchronous computer-mediated discourse needed for Carl Bereiter and Marlene Scardamalia’s knowledge-creation model. Distinctions were set up between three modes of discourse: knowledge sharing, knowledge construction, and knowledge creation. These were applied to the asynchronous online discourses of four groups of secondary school students (40 students in total) who studied aspects of an outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and related topics. The participants completed a pretest of relevant knowledge and a collaborative summary note in Knowledge Forum, in which they self-assessed their collective knowledge advances. A coding scheme was then developed and applied to the group discourses to obtain a possible explanation of the between-group differences in the performance of the summary notes and examine the discourses as examples of the three modes. The findings indicate that the group with the best summary note was involved in a threshold knowledge-creation discourse. Of the other groups, one engaged in a knowledge-sharing discourse and the discourses of other two groups were hybrids of all three modes. Several strategies for cultivating knowledge-creation discourse are proposed.

Keywords: Knowledge sharing, Constructivism, Knowledge building, Knowledge creation, Argumentation

Citation: van Aalst, J. (2009) Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. ijcscl 4 (3), pp. 259-287

DOI: 10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5

Preprint: vanaalst_4_3.pdf

About this article at link.springer.com [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5] including a link to the official electronic version.