Print version of

Journal Contents

all articles of volume 2 issue 1 | return to Journal Contents

Article of Volume 2, Issue 1, March 2007

Barriers to online critical discourse

Authors: Liam Rourke, Heather Kanuka

Abstract: This qualitative case study illustrates barriers to informal argumentation and reasoned debate, i.e., critical discourse, in online forums. The case is the computer conference of a 15-week, graduate-level humanities course offered entirely at a distance. Twelve students, all with families and careers, were enrolled in the course. We read all messages as they were posted and interviewed five of the students several times during the course. The students provided three insights into our interpretation that the forums contained little critical discourse: (1) The students did not orient to the conference as a forum for critical discourse, and worse, they had competing orientations; (2) they perceived critiques as personal attacks; and (3) they realized early on that critical discourse was a bothersome means to obtain their participation marks. Certain practices may ease some of these difficulties, including (1) well-structured learning activities with clearly defined roles for teachers and students, and (2) a method of assessing students’ participation that reflects the time and effort required to engage in critical discourse.

Keywords: Critical discourse, Higher education, Computer support for collaborative learning

Citation: Rourke, L. & Kanuka, H. (2007) Barriers to online critical discourse. ijcscl 2 (1)

DOI: 10.1007/s11412-007-9007-3

Preprint: Acrobat-PDF rourke_kanuka_2_1.pdf

About this article at [] including a link to the official electronic version.