Print version of

Journal Contents

all articles of volume 6 issue 1 | return to Journal Contents

Article of Volume 6, Issue 1, March 2011

Perspective taking and synchronous argumentation for learning the day/night cycle

Authors: Baruch B. Schwarz, Yaron Schur, Haim Pensso, Naama Tayer

Abstract: Changing practices in schools is a very complex endeavor. This paper is about new practices we prompted to foster collaboration and critical reasoning in science classrooms: the presentation of pictures representing different perspectives, small group synchronous argumentation, and moderation of synchronous argumentation. A CSCL tool helped in supporting synchronous argumentation through graphical representations of argumentative moves. We checked the viability of these practices in science classrooms. To do so, we investigated whether these practices led to conceptual learning, and undertook interactional analyses to study the behaviors of students and teachers. Thirtytwo Grade 8 students participated in a series of activities on the day/night cycle. Learning was measured by the correctness of knowledge, the extent to which it was elaborated, the mental models that emerged from the explanations, the knowledge integration in explanations, and their simplicity. We showed that participants could learn the day/night cycle concept, as all measures of learning improved. For some students, it even led to conceptual change. However, the specific help provided by teachers during collective argumentation did not yield additional learning. The analysis of protocols of teacher-led collective argumentation indicated that although the teachers’ help was needed, some teachers had difficulties monitoring these synchronous discussions. We conclude that the next step of the design-research cycle should be devoted to (a) the development of new tools directed at helping teachers facilitate synchronous collective argumentation, and to (b) activities including teachers, designers, and researchers for elaborating new strategies to use these tools to improve the already positive learning outcomes from synchronous argumentation.

Keywords: Argumentation, Inquiry based learning, Conceptual learning, CSCA tools, Expansive learning

Citation: Schwarz, B. B., Schur, Y, Pensso, H., & Tayer, N. (2011) Perspective taking and synchronous argumentation for learning the day/night cycle. ijcscl 6 (1), pp. 113-138

DOI: 10.1007/s11412-010-9100-x

Preprint: Acrobat-PDF schwarz_schur_pensso_tayer_6_1.pdf

About this article at [] including a link to the official electronic version.